SAFETY
AND SOUNDNESS,
FIELD OF MEMBERSHIP
AND TODAY’S CREDIT UNION MARKETPLACE –
HOW “ACCESS
ACROSS AMERICA” FITS IN
TO AN EFFECTIVE DUAL CHARTERING SYSTEM
Remarks
by
Dennis
Dollar
NCUA Chairman
At
the
35th
NAFCU Annual Conference
Sheraton
Seattle
Seattle, Washington
Thursday,
July 18, 2002
It is an honor
to be with you again this year at the 35th NAFCU Annual Conference here
in Seattle. Having been with you now five consecutive years, it is
a particular honor to be with you for the first time as Chairman of
the National Credit Union Administration Board. Over the past three
years I have come before you in three different capacities – two years
ago as an NCUA Board Member, last year as Acting Chairman and, now,
this year having been designated by the President as Chairman.
I believe that
the designation of a new NCUA Chairman, having been signed by the President
on September 13, 2001, only two days after the most horrific attack
in our nation’s history on civilians in our homeland, is significant
for several reasons which, although I consider it one of the highlights
of my professional and political career, have less to do with me and
more to do with America’s credit unions.
The appointment
of a new NCUA Chairman two days after this national tragedy was, in
my opinion, an indication of the coming of age of credit unions, both
strategically and in recognition by America’s decision-makers at the
highest levels of the value of credit union service and the role credit
unions play in the nation’s economy (and can play in the future). This
appointment was one of a handful President Bush made in the days immediately
after September 11 to make a statement that the nation’s economy was
strong and would emerge from the uncertainty of those days stronger
than ever, that steady hands were in charge of the regulatory agencies
overseeing America’s financial institutions and that credit unions would
be a part of the re-building of public confidence in our future and
greatness as a nation.
Today, I come
before you as Chairman to talk about that future and to declare that
the future of America’s credit unions is bright.
In a marketplace
which is both dynamic and demanding, credit unions have a place that
is both historically founded but with great promise for tomorrow. As
the Chairman of the regulatory agency responsible for monitoring and
ensuring the safety and soundness of each of you as federal credit unions,
I want to talk with you today about both that dynamic marketplace and
safety and soundness…for I do not know how we can talk about one without
the other.
The future of
visionary and innovative credit unions to meet the growing needs and
demands of their members in a dynamic marketplace is built upon a foundation
of safety and soundness. Yet, on the other side of the same coin, the
future safety and soundness of America’s credit unions is built upon
their ability to adjust to that dynamic marketplace by providing visionary
and innovative service. The two cannot be separated.
That is why
I have long said that NCUA as a regulator cannot separate our safety
and soundness responsibilities from the need to create a regulatory
environment which empowers strongly-capitalized credit unions with solid
management performance to grow in both the way you deliver your services
to your members but also in the number of members who have access to
your services. If we do not enable credit unions to remain viable through
well-managed growth, we will doom those credit unions to falling so
far behind in a rapidly changing market that they may never catch up.
The most significant potential safety and soundness threat to any financial
institution in today’s marketplace would be the inability to adjust
to the changing needs of that marketplace. It has been my goal as an
NCUA Board Member since 1997 and will remain my goal for the remainder
of my tenure as Chairman to make sure credit unions are as safe and
sound as their members deserve and as effective in meeting their needs
for low-cost financial services as their members demand.
As always, there
are statutory considerations and even restraints that we must abide
by in pursuing this goal. But, within the confines of the law, we must
empower credit unions to meet the ever growing and emerging needs of
your members in not only today’s marketplace, but in tomorrow’s as well.
Speaking to
NAFCU today, I want to talk about the importance of strengthening the
position of federally chartered credit unions to meet this vision for
the future – a vision clearly stated in NCUA’s strategic plan which
I am proud to say has set the blueprint for our agency to be more responsive
to this changing marketplace even as we continue to maintain our first
and foremost commitment to safety and soundness in that marketplace.
I want to make
an important point as I speak briefly about this goal. I am a former
state legislator who has long believed in a proper concept of federalism,
realizing the proper role of the federal government and balancing that
with the proper role of the states. I resented as a state legislator
the arrogance of the federal government at times when through federal
intervention, unfunded mandates and excessive regulation they chose
what they felt was best for my state without recognizing the individual
characteristics which might make their Washington-based solution not
to be the right one for the folks back home. I still carry with me
a strong belief in keeping state matters at the state level and federal
matters at the federal level. That is why today I am a strong believer
in an effective dual chartering system of credit union regulation and
supervision. Notice the use of the word “effective” when I speak of
dual chartering.
I use that word
for a reason. Inherent in an effective dual chartering system is a
strong and viable federal credit union charter. It is essential that
visionary credit unions who need growth in membership and services to
meet their business projections and to build their financial stability
for the future be able to do so as federal charters.
Although I would
never seek to restrict the rights of states to extend such a regulatory
environment to their state-chartered credit unions as long as they continue
to do so in a safe and sound manner, I will likewise never apologize
for seeking ways to make the federal charter a more viable option as
well. The winners in an effective dual chartering system with viable
options for innovative and growth-oriented credit unions, whether they
be state or federal, will be the members.
We have attempted
in the past eighteen months to put in place initiatives at the federal
level designed to make the federal charter more viable and to create
a regulatory environment conducive to the long term needs of federal
credit unions and their members…some for growth, others to remain small
with a more specialized market…some for additional services where the
law allows and others to remain with a smaller array of services with
an emphasis on quality and not quantity…some for the ability to offer
their longstanding services in more technologically advanced ways and
others to have the regulatory flexibility to enhance their technology
not now, but down the line when it is financially right for them.
Included in
our ways to accomplish these goals have been our passage of the RegFlex
initiative, the revised Incidental Powers rule, expanded CUSO authority,
risk-based examination scheduling and a risk-focused exam program, proposals
recently out for comment which are designed to address credit union
investment authority, corporate credit union regulation and international
branching in a way which enables credit unions to serve better even
as they serve more safely.
These initiatives
must and, I hope, will continue. Where the statute allows, as Chairman
I intend to continue to encourage the NCUA Board to enable credit unions
to extend their services in more innovative ways to more members in
my belief that this will result in more folks from all walks of life
having access to lower-cost financial services and more long term viability
of credit unions as safe and sound not-for-profit financial cooperatives
filling your niche in a marketplace that needs, yes, needs the not-for-profit
sector to be viable and growing. I believe that this NCUA Board is
not only up to that challenge, but is looking forward to it.
It is virtually
impossible for anyone to achieve the American dream of financial independence
if his or her primary financial institution is a pawn shop, title loan
company or check cashing outlet.
Financial self-sufficiency
is often demonstrated by such recognized indicators as a savings account
available to help meet future needs such as college for the kids, medical
costs or retirement; ability to access entrepreneurial capital for a
small start-up business if needed; ready access to personal credit for
a vehicle, appliances or other high-dollar necessities; and home ownership.
By these measures, financial independence for America’s over 90 million
‘unbanked’ or ‘underserved’ individuals is indeed an elusive goal which
they might never meet without a partner. Credit unions can be that
partner for many of these Americans in their goal for personal empowerment
through financial self-sufficiency.
Believing that
credit unions can be a part of the solution to this growing need in
our country, NCUA has developed an initiative we call ‘Access Across
America’ which is designed to facilitate the extension of low-cost credit
union services to millions of these citizens. The initiative is already
showing tremendous results with a growing interest being expressed daily
by credit unions, the neighborhoods which need their services and others
who are watching what credit unions are accomplishing through this initiative.
Why does Access
Across America matter? The three A’s in the program’s name tell the
story.
Access
speaks to the purpose of the program and the proper role of
NCUA as a governmental agency. Government has never signed up the first
credit union member, nor has it made the first credit union loan. Vital
though our role is as a safety and soundness regulator, NCUA must recognize
the limits of what we can and cannot do.
Credit unions
serve their members. NCUA cannot do that. However, as a governmental
agency, we can be and should be an agent of access and opportunity to
that service.
In fact, as
long as the service is provided in accordance with applicable law and
regulation and is extended in a safe and sound manner, NCUA should facilitate
credit unions as they seek to reach out and provide lower-cost financial
services to as many Americans as possible.
Today over 90
million Americans reside in census tracts designated by the US Treasury
Department’s Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) program
as underserved. These are folks who have largely been abandoned by
traditional financial institutions during the merger-mania years and
have been left to the mercy of the check cashers and pawn shops which
proliferate in their neighborhoods.
Although NCUA
as a government agency cannot guarantee that they will choose to join
a credit union or take advantage of a credit union’s services if offered,
we can make it easier for visionary, well-managed credit unions to adopt
those underserved neighborhoods into their fields of membership and
to extend many of the needed services to those who live there.
Make no mistake
about it. Even though I am a strong proponent of government remaining
in its proper role and limiting its arm from over reaching into many
areas where excessive regulation creates more problems than it solves,
I do believe that government has some clear responsibilities which it
should do and do them well. Ensuring safety and soundness with a regulatory
process which has integrity and is effective without being excessive
is one of those responsibilities. Being an agent of access and opportunity
for those who desire a better life is another from which we must not
waiver. Access Across America is an initiative founded in both of these
responsibilities.
Through a streamlined
process and the prioritization of applications by those credit unions
who submit a workable business plan to serve one or more of these underserved
areas, NCUA was able to be an agent of opportunity for over 16.1 million
Americans who became eligible to join a credit union under our Access
Across America initiative in 2001.
Over 9.1 million
additional Americans living in CDFI underserved areas have been made
eligible to join a credit union during the first six months of this
year. Over 200 federal credit unions have stepped forward to adopt
these neighborhoods in the last 18 months and, although such an expansion
of services is not the right fit for every credit union and must be
carefully evaluated as a part of a safe and sound business plan, it
is an opportunity for many credit unions to consider. This is a partnership
– and the success depends, not just on NCUA, but also on America’s credit
unions.
We encourage
credit unions under Access Across America to think outside their present
comfort zones and to see the opportunities available in many of these
underserved areas. As they examine the possibilities of extending service
to these neighborhoods as a part of their outreach-oriented business
plans, NCUA is turning an approval process which once took over a year
into one which can be completed in less than two months.
Without sacrificing
standards but by prioritizing streamlined process, NCUA has removed
the biggest single deterrent to credit unions reaching out to adopt
these underserved areas - regulatory hurdles.
As mentioned
above, the results in 2001 are staggering when compared with just two
years ago in 1999 when only 7 credit unions adopted underserved areas
with only 350,000 residents.
The difference
is an emphasis on access – which is what the Credit Union Membership
Access Act was all about and which Access Across America is built upon.
Across
speaks to the nationwide dimensions of this initiative. Just as those
90 million Americans are scattered across this great land of ours, so
are the credit unions that can provide them with an alternative to a
payday lender’s 400% loan or a rent-to-own company’s 200% furniture
financing plan.
In 2001, 165
credit unions adopted a record 282 underserved areas. Applications
on a pace to far exceed that record number continue to be received so
far in 2002. These underserved areas are located all across the country
with applications having been approved in 41 states since the program
began. All six of NCUA’s regional offices have made Access Across America
a high priority and it will remain so.
When combined
with last year’s approval of 135 community charter conversions or expansions
(each of which also contained a number of CDFI underserved areas in
the approved communities), America’s credit unions have demonstrated
that they are willing to put their money where their mouth is by taking
advantage of the legal and regulatory opportunities available to them
to serve “unbanked” neighborhoods.
Because they
are required by NCUA regulation to have a physical presence in any underserved
area they choose to serve, credit unions demonstrate through their investment
in the community that they are willing to be a lower-cost alternative
to the high-cost lenders which have been often accused (and rightly
so) of being predatory in their lending practices, rates and terms in
many of those same communities.
Even though
they are often criticized for reaching out to serve the very communities
their critics have abandoned, NCUA believes credit unions who desire
to allow their heartbeat for serving the unbanked to manifest itself
through service to these neighborhoods should be facilitated so long
as they have a safe and sound plan for doing so.
America
needs access to the lower-cost services credit unions can provide.
It is then their choice as a consumer as to whether to take advantage
of those services. History tells us that they will do so when the opportunity
is there. Credit unions have over 80 million members nationwide today.
Financial literacy
is a key element in helping meet the needs of the “unbanked” in America.
Credit unions are increasing their financial counseling programs in
these communities, helping folks recognize that a 400% payday loan is
not a good deal no matter how badly they need the money today.
Working in partnership
with other governmental agencies as a part of the Bush administration’s
focus on creating empowerment opportunities for individuals who may
lack financial self-sufficiency today, NCUA is encouraging credit unions
to participate in programs offered by the Treasury Department, HUD,
Department of Agriculture, Small Business Administration, and others
to help them further financial literacy efforts and extend credit and
savings opportunities for first-time members – many of whom are opening
their first-ever account.
One of the most-overlooked
aspects of NCUA’s Access Across America initiative is the partnership
opportunities it encourages with these other governmental programs.
Links to these programs – most of which credit unions are fully eligible
to participate in – are available on the website www.accessacrossamerica.gov
or through NCUA’s own www.ncua.gov.
Although credit
unions are indeed stepping forward through this initiative to help achieve
Access Across America without a regulatory or statutory mandate requiring
them to do so, we should all recognize that this must be an ongoing
effort. Not only should credit unions consider whether their business
planning would benefit by outreach into an underserved neighborhood
as an addition to their present field of membership, but all credit
unions should keep good records to demonstrate their successes in this
arena.
Serving people
from all walks of life is an important part of the credit union heartbeat
and the success stories are legion. Those stories must be documented
and shared by the credit unions who have seen the life-changing victories
they have empowered through their outreach efforts.
And we at NCUA
must continue to be the agent of opportunity and access which makes
those success stories possible.
That is why
Access Across America matters.
But access carries
within it a need for us as an agency to continue to look at our field
of membership rules and regulations and to make sure they remain up-to-date
with the needs of that changing and dynamic marketplace we have been
discussing today. In fact, it was the 1999 re-write of our field of
membership rules which put into place the ability of federal credit
unions to more easily adopt underserved areas and laid the foundation
for the record-setting performance in this area we are now seeing through
our Access Across America initiative.
We will never
be fully successful in furthering access across America if we do not
continue to make our field of membership rules and process more open
where it is allowable under the law and more user-friendly when both
credit unions, employer groups, associations, communities, faith-based
organizations and, most importantly, members try to take advantage of
its purpose to extend lower-cost financial services to more Americans.
As you know,
the NCUA Board has enacted two updates to our field of membership rules
for federal credit unions since the passage of HR 1151, the Credit Union
Membership Access Act, in 1998. The first was approved in 1999 and
the second in 2000.
As was appropriate
because those rules were challenged in court by critics and competitors
who self-interpreted the Credit Union Membership Access Act to leave
out its mandate for enhanced access, we gave those rules a couple of
years to both demonstrate the difference they could make for credit
unions and their members, as well as to allow time for the court challenges
to work their way to conclusion.
Now, in 2002,
not only do we have an unequivocal court ruling that decisively found
NCUA to have followed both the letter and the spirit of CUMAA in passing
our field of membership rules, we also have three full years of experience
with our new field of membership rules, learning how they have helped
many federal credit unions extend their service, strengthen their financial
stability and improve access to lower-cost financial services to their
field of membership. We have set benchmarks over those three years
and credit unions have responded to those benchmarks. Processing time
has improved to record levels. An internet approval process has enabled
credit unions to extend immediate access to SEGs below 500 employees.
Community charter conversions and the adoption of underserved areas,
as I mentioned a moment ago, are being processed much more efficiently
and rapidly without any lowering of standards or sacrificing of safety
and soundness.
But we still
have work to do.
I would like
to announce to you today that NCUA’s Field of Membership Task Force
is back at work and has been for the past several months. They are
taking the experience of the past three years, both yours and ours,
and are studying both the statute and the court decision to find ways
to make our field of membership rules even more user-friendly and with
an even greater eye towards extending access to more Americans who need
the low-cost financial services a credit union can provide.
As we move forward
with this 2002 update of our field of membership rules based upon our
experience of recent years since CUMAA passed, it is my belief as Chairman
that we should keep the following priorities at the top of our list
as we move forward in this important endeavor. I know that these will
certainly be my priorities as I work with the Field of Membership Task
Force and evaluate their recommendations to the NCUA Board for updating
our Field of Membership Manual:
---First
and foremost, we will continue – as we have from the beginning and the
courts have so upheld - to stay within the letter and the spirit of
the Credit Union Membership Access Act. Nothing would hurt our efforts
towards access more than to find ourselves facing a future court ruling
or legislative action which finds that the regulator went beyond the
bounds of the statutes passed by Congress.
---Next,
but of equal importance, we will continue to hold our safety and soundness
standards high. It is a Faustian bargain to extend membership or service
beyond a credit union’s financial ability to serve. We want to see
credit unions around to serve the next generation of members as well
as this present generation. And we want to always be able to proudly
say, without fear of contradiction, that not one penny of taxpayer dollars
has ever been used to bail out a federally insured credit union.
But, again remember,
it is impossible to separate safety and soundness from the ability to
of credit unions to compete in a fast-changing marketplace. One of
the most damaging safety and soundness decisions we could make would
be to force credit unions to operate in a dynamic marketplace without
the ability to adjust to and grow with that marketplace. The two cannot
be separated and we must keep that in our sights.
---Thirdly,
we will look for ways to streamline process to make it easier for credit
unions to add employer groups, associations, faith-based organizations,
communities, low-income and underserved areas. Efficient regulatory
process can be a stimulant to credit union vision and innovation, even
as unnecessary regulatory hurdles can be a deterrent.
---Fourthly,
we will make any recommended changes based upon a realization that if
credit unions who need to grow cannot do so under the federal charter,
we will lose the great value of the dual chartering system. We want
to see federal credit unions have growth opportunities commensurate
with their ability to serve soundly, their desire to serve effectively
and the service needs of their fields of membership and their prospective
fields of membership. We want to facilitate greater credit union access
in every way that the law allows when it is built upon the solid foundation
of safety and soundness.
---Lastly,
we will seek your comments. I hope to see the NCUA Board put out for
a public comment period a revised field of membership proposal before
the end of the fourth quarter of 2002. With appropriate time for the
commenters to be heard and your views evaluated, my goal is to see a
new field of membership manual approved by the end of the first quarter
of 2003.
Now, I realize
that everything you would like to see in the field of membership rules
will not and, frankly, cannot be included under existing law. Perhaps
you will someday find the opportunity to encourage Congress to enhance
what the law allows federal credit unions to provide in services and
to whom. That is a political decision for you to make as an industry.
But, until such changes are made by Congress, we must abide by the existing
law. That is our job as an agency created by Congress.
But we can make
sure the existing law works to its fullest extent, and works better
than even it does today, for those millions of Americans who still need
access to a credit union. It is my commitment that we do so.
And, in doing
so, I believe that we enhance the dual chartering system, not by restricting
the states in their efforts to do the same, but by making the federal
charter more viable for credit unions of all sizes, all types of fields
of membership and serving all types of folks.
Access Across
America requires a commitment to all three words…access – across -
America. It requires a commitment of both the regulator and the regulated
for broad-based access to lower-cost financial services for all in America
who need it and seek it. NCUA is working to put that commitment into
practice.
I encourage
you to share that commitment, demonstrate that commitment, document
where possible your successes as you daily meet that commitment and
extend that commitment to more who need it with vision, innovation,
a safe and sound business plan and diligent management.
As you do, you
will make an even more indelible mark on America than the significant
one you have already made.
Thank you very
much.
Dennis Dollar
was appointed Chairman of the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA)
by President Bush in 2001. A former two-term member of the Mississippi
House of Representatives, Chairman Dollar served as President and CEO
of the Gulfport VA Federal Credit Union in Gulfport, Mississippi, prior
to his confirmation to the NCUA Board in 1997.
|